Identification of Problems Faced by Individuals with Epilepsy in Health Communication
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
E-PUB
29 January 2026

Identification of Problems Faced by Individuals with Epilepsy in Health Communication

Arch Epilepsy. Published online 29 January 2026.
1. Atatürk University Faculty of Nursing, Department of Medical Nursing, Erzurum, Türkiye
2. Gümüşhane University Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Gümüşhane, Türkiye
3. Trabzon University, Tonya Vocational School, Department of Health Care Services, Trabzon, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 04.08.2025
Accepted Date: 18.12.2025
E-Pub Date: 29.01.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objective

Individuals with epilepsy often face challenges with medication adherence and health monitoring because communication difficulties that hinder self-expression and information exchange, thereby complicating effective disease management. This study aimed to examine the health communication problems experienced by individuals with epilepsy.

Methods

This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among 172 individuals with epilepsy who presented to the neurology outpatient clinic in eastern and northern Türkiye between August 2023 and August 2024. Study data were collected using the descriptive data form and the health communication problems scale. The independent groups t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey test were used to evaluate the data.

Results

On the health communication problems scale, individuals with epilepsy had mean scores of 2.41±0.53 for the effective communication problems sub-dimension, 2.88±0.80 for the social communication problems sub-dimension, and 2.68±0.72 for the communication barriers sub-dimension. No significant differences were detected in the mean scores for health communication problems among individuals with epilepsy by sex, health expenditure, seizure type, or seizure characteristics (p>0.05).

Conclusion

The study revealed that individuals with epilepsy experienced moderate difficulty with health communication. Those who were married, had higher educational attainment, were unemployed, had lower income levels, and were receiving polytherapy experienced greater communication challenges with healthcare professionals.

Keywords:
Epilepsy, healthcare professionals, communication barriers

MAIN POINTS

• Effective health communication is crucial for individuals with epilepsy, as it supports optimal disease management and enhances adherence to treatment. This study explores the communication difficulties encountered by individuals with epilepsy during interactions with healthcare professionals. The findings reveal persistent challenges in understanding medical information, expressing symptoms clearly, and feeling adequately understood by healthcare providers.

• These results underscore the importance of targeted communication training and patient-centered approaches for professionals involved in the care of individuals with epilepsy.

• Enhancing health communication practices may lead to improved clinical outcomes and a higher quality of life for this population.

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures caused by abnormal and excessive electrical discharges in cortical neurons.1, 2 Epileptic seizures are sudden clinical events marked by spontaneous recurrence and excessive neuronal electrical activity, often accompanied by loss of consciousness.2-5 Communication is a fundamental process for individuals and society, facilitating relationships and interactions by conveying thoughts, feelings, and information. In this context, health communication is critically important, as individuals’ ability to understand medical information, express their needs, and manage their health effectively depends on the quality of communication.6-10 Health communication is the exchange of information between individuals or groups regarding health-related issues.11 With advances in healthcare, the importance and application of health communication are increasing across various levels and intensities.12, 13 Health communication integrates the fields of medical science and communication science.14 Although it is central to clinical procedures such as diagnosis, treatment, and patient-provider interactions, health communication also encompasses how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to health-related issues.12, 14, 15 It plays a vital role in developing strategies to manage health problems, understanding symptoms, recognizing risks, and making informed decisions.7, 16 Moreover, effective health communication contributes to disease prevention, health promotion, and efficient management of medical conditions, producing positive individual, social, institutional, and economic outcomes.17-20 It influences patients’ choice of healthcare institutions, their trust in the healthcare system, adherence to treatment, length of hospital stay, and overall quality of care and satisfaction with care.7

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological condition that significantly affects the well-being of individuals, families, and societies.21 Individuals with epilepsy often experience comorbidities and must carefully manage both their primary condition and associated disorders.22, 23 Chronic diseases have profound medical, economic, psychological, and social impacts on individuals, often leading to communication challenges.24 Developing effective self-management strategies for epilepsy requires strong patient-provider communication within a patient-centered approach to care to ensure treatment adherence and to optimize health outcomes.22, 25

In managing epilepsy, communication plays an increasingly crucial role. Communication difficulties encountered by individuals during healthcare interactions can hinder self-expression, limit access to adequate information, and compromise disease management. Although previous studies have explored health communication in various populations, no research has specifically addressed the communication problems experienced by individuals with epilepsy. This study aimed to evaluate health communication problems among individuals with epilepsy residing in the northern and eastern regions of Türkiye and to identify factors influencing these problems.

Study Questions

• What are the health communication problems of individuals with epilepsy?

• What are the factors affecting the health communication problems of individuals with epilepsy?

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Giresun and Erzurum, located in Northern and Eastern Türkiye, respectively.

Participants

Individuals diagnosed with epilepsy who were followed for at least 6 months at the Neurology Outpatient Clinics of Atatürk University and Giresun University were included in the study. A total of 172 individuals with epilepsy who met the inclusion criteria (being 18 years of age or older, not having cognitive or communication problems, being able to answer the questions in the interview form, and being volunteers for the research) were reached between August 2023 and August 2024 without any sample selection.

Data Collection

The descriptive data form and the health communication problems scale (HCPS) were used to collect the study data.

Descriptive Data Form

The researchers prepared the form, which consisted of 13 questions about age, marital status, sex, education, income, employment status, place of residence, diagnosis period, medication use and number of medications used by individuals with epilepsy, number of seizures in the last year, and seizure types. Loss of consciousness was not evaluated in this study.

Health Communication Problems Scale

The HCPS was developed by Yeşildal et al.26 to identify communication problems experienced by patients in interactions with healthcare personnel. The 5-point Likert-type scale consists of 13 items and three sub-dimensions: effective communication (items 1-6), social communication (items 7-9), and communication barriers (items 10-13). The minimum score that can be obtained on the scale is 13, and the maximum score is 65. Items 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 of the scale are reverse-coded. As the score on the scale increases, health communication becomes increasingly problematic. The responses on the scale range from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). The Cronbach’s alpha for the original scale was 0.77,26 and the overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.756 in this study.

Statistical Analysis

The independent groups t-test was used to analyze data from two groups and the one-way ANOVA test was used for three or more groups. Multiple comparisons were made for the results that were significant in the one-way ANOVA, and the Tukey test was used because the data showed homogeneous variances.

Ethical Issues

Written approval was obtained from the Atatürk University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval no: 41, date: 26.01.2023). Permission was obtained from the Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine and the Giresun University Department of Neurology. Verbal and written informed consent was obtained from individuals with epilepsy prior to data collection.

RESULTS

Health Communication Problems and Related Factors

Individuals with epilepsy scored 2.41±0.53 on the effective communication problem sub-dimension of the HCPS, 2.88±0.80 on the social communication problem sub-dimension, 2.68±0.72 on the communication barriers sub-dimension, and 2.59±0.51 overall on the HCPS. the effective communication and communication barriers sub-dimensions scored below the obtainable average (x̄=3.00), whereas the social communication problem sub-dimension scored close to the obtainable average (x̄=3.00) (Table 1).

The mean age of individuals with epilepsy was 37.16±14.83 years, and the mean duration of epilepsy was 14.20±10.64 years. Of the participants, 56.4% were female, 61.6% were married, 45.9% were secondary school graduates, 49.4% lived in the city center, 66.9% were unemployed, 57.6% had income lower than expenses, 33.7% experienced one seizure per year, 50.6% had an undetermined seizure type, and 50% were on polytherapy (Table 2).

No significant differences were detected in mean scores for health communication problems among individuals with epilepsy by sex, health expenditure, seizure type, or seizure characteristics (p>0.05). However, the mean scores for effective communication problems (t=2.718, p<0.01) and social communication problems (t=3.817, p<0.001) differed significantly by marital status, with married individuals showing higher scores than single individuals.

By educational status, the mean score for social communication problems differed significantly (F=6.848, p<0.001): primary school graduates had higher scores than illiterate individuals, and primary and secondary school graduates had higher scores than those with a bachelor’s degree or higher. No significant differences were observed in effective communication problems or communication barriers across educational levels.

Place of residence showed a significant effect on social communication problems (F=3.352, p<0.05); however, multiple-comparison tests revealed no significant differences between specific groups.

Employment status significantly affected social communication problem scores (t=2.229, p<0.05), with unemployed individuals reporting higher scores than employed individuals.

Perceived income status was significantly associated with effective communication problems (t=3.513, p<0.001), with participants whose income was less than their expenses having higher scores.

Finally, drug use influenced problems with effective communication (t=-2.288, p<0.05), such that polytherapy users reported higher scores than monotherapy users (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

Effective communication between individuals with epilepsy, their families, and healthcare professionals is crucial for optimal treatment and care management. Previous studies have emphasized the negative impact of communication problems on treatment outcomes.27 Improving communication is key to enhancing the quality of healthcare for these patients.28, 29 The results of the present study, which examined healthcare communication problems among individuals with epilepsy, are discussed in the context of existing literature.

This study aimed to investigate the health communication challenges faced by individuals with epilepsy and the factors influencing these difficulties. The main findings revealed that married individuals, individuals with higher levels of education, unemployed individuals, and low-income patients experienced more pronounced communication problems.

Furthermore, patients receiving polytherapy exhibited greater communication difficulties than patients receiving monotherapy. These results highlight the influence of demographic, socioeconomic, and treatment-related factors on patient-provider communication and underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve care quality, patient satisfaction, and overall health outcomes in individuals with epilepsy.

The study found that married individuals experienced more problems with effective and social communication than single individuals.27 However, some studies report contrasting findings, indicating either no significant relationship between marital status and communication problems30 or that single individuals face more social communication challenges.31 This discrepancy may reflect differences in study populations, cultural contexts, or social support systems. In our cohort, married individuals may experience reduced social tolerance because of responsibilities, which highlights the importance of individual and contextual factors when interpreting the results.

Notably, the study found that individuals with higher levels of education reported more communication problems in healthcare settings. Consistent with previous research, this may result from increased expectations and attention to detail during healthcare interactions.27, 30-34 Conversely, patients with lower education levels may prefer sincere and empathetic communication styles, facilitating clearer and more effective interactions with healthcare professionals. Thus, more highly educated individuals may perceive communication challenges more acutely, while individuals with less education may experience fewer problems due to simpler, more direct communication styles. Unemployed individuals with epilepsy experienced more social communication problems than employed individuals with epilepsy. No comparable findings regarding employment status were identified in the literature. This may reflect narrower social circles, psychosocial stress, economic concerns, or social perceptions affecting communication among unemployed patients. Low-income individuals experienced more pronounced communication difficulties, consistent with findings that limited social support can hinder effective health communication.35 The literature shows mixed results; some studies report that higher-income individuals face more social communication problems,32 while others find no relationship between income and communication challenges.30, 32, 36 In our study, low-income patients may hesitate to express their needs due to limited social support networks. Although differences in social communication problems were observed between places of residence, multiple-comparison tests showed that these differences were not statistically significant. This suggests that residence alone does not directly affect social communication, and other individual or socioeconomic factors may play a larger role.33 Polytherapy users had higher scores for communication problems than monotherapy users, indicating that multiple medications may contribute to communication difficulties through physical or cognitive impairments, such as confusion.37, 38 These individuals may seek more guidance from healthcare personnel, highlighting the importance of effective and continuous communication to reduce polypharmacy complications.39 Health communication plays a crucial role in healthcare effectiveness. Health is not only a biomedical concept but also a multidimensional phenomenon encompassing social, psychological, and cultural dimensions.40

In the present study, the lowest mean score on the HCPS was 2.41±0.53 in the effective communication sub-dimension, with an overall mean of 2.59±0.51. Compared with the literature reporting an overall mean of 2.79,32 our cohort experienced relatively fewer communication problems. This may reflect higher treatment adherence, frequent interactions with healthcare personnel, or specific sociodemographic characteristics.

Study Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, it was limited to individuals attending neurology outpatient clinics in the northern and eastern regions of Türkiye, which may limit generalizability. Second, data were self-reported, introducing potential social desirability bias. Third, the cross-sectional design prevents causal inference. Finally, variables such as psychiatric comorbidities, disease duration, and treatment compliance, which may affect communication, were not included. These limitations should be considered when interpreting and generalizing the findings.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with epilepsy experience moderate difficulties in health communication. Marital status, higher education, unemployment, low-income, and polytherapy use were associated with greater communication challenges. Future research should explore strategies to alleviate these problems and support effective communication. Healthcare professionals play a key role in educating patients about communication challenges. Educational programs should be developed to strengthen healthcare providers’ communication skills. Clear informational materials and support groups for individuals with epilepsy should be established. Improving patients’ communication skills can enhance their understanding of health issues and improve their quality of life and psychosocial well-being. Addressing individual needs and leveraging technology can optimize the benefits of health services for individuals with epilepsy.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Written approval was obtained from the Atatürk University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval no: 41, date: 26.01.2023).
Informed Consent: Verbal and written informed consent was obtained from individuals with epilepsy prior to data collection.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: N.B., D.A.C., N.İ.A., Concept: D.A.C., Design: D.A.C., Data Collection or Processing: D.A.C., N.İ.A., Analysis or Interpretation: D.A.C., Literature Search: N.B., D.A.C., Writing: N.B., D.A.C.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Akdağ G, İlhan Algın D, Erdinç OO. Epilepsi/epilepsy. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi. 2016;38:35-41.
2
Yel P, Karadakovan A. Compliance with treatment in epilepsy patients and affecting factors. J Ege University Nursing Faculty. 2021;37(3):223-238.
3
Mollaoğlu M, Ovayolu N, Ovayolu Ö. Nervous system diseases and nursing management. In: Ovayolu N, Ovayolu Ö, editors. Basic internal medicine nursing. Adana: Çukurova Nobel Medical Bookstore; 2016. p. 108-121.
4
Johnston MV. The nervous system. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 18th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, Elsevier; 2007. p. 2433-2530.
5
Dayapoglu N, Ayyıldız NI, Seker D. Determination of health fatalism and the factors affecting health fatalism in patients with epilepsy in the North of Turkey. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;115:107641.
6
Vardarlıer P, Öztürk C. The role of social media use in health communication. Sociological Thought. 2020;5(1):1-18.
7
Gül M, Türe GA. Communication and sharing of medical information. Social Sciences Studies Journal. 2024;10(2):243-248.
8
Granados-Gámez G, Sáez-Ruiz IM, Márquez-Hernández VV, et al. Development and validation of the questionnaire to analyze the communication of nurses in nurse-patient therapeutic communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(1):145-150.
9
Saldamlı A, Andsoy II. Interpersonal communication styles and teamwork attitudes of health professionals in the surgical process. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2019;44(1):483-491.
10
Koçak A, Bulduklu Y. Health communication: motivations of the elderly to watch health programs broadcasted on television. Selçuk İletişim. 2010;6(3):5-17.
11
Okay A. Health communication. İstanbul: Farmaskop/MediaCat; 2009. p. 21-25.
12
Işık T. Sağlık iletişiminde dijital iletişim kanallarının kullanımı: sektör aktörlerinden Acıbadem Hastanesinin dijital iletişim kanalı ve sosyal medya hesaplarının incelenmesi. Elektronik Cumhuriyet İletişim Dergisi. 2019;1(2):147-162.
13
Yılmaz AA. Trust and communication in patient-physician relationship: an application in Akdeniz University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF unit [master’s thesis]. Antalya: Akdeniz University; 2005.
14
Aydoğdu İ. Evaluation of the novel coronavirus outbreak in the context of communication models used in the health sector. International Journal of Social Research. 2020;13(71):833-848.
15
Sarella PNK, Vinny TM. AI-driven natural language processing in healthcare: transforming patient-provider communication. Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2024;17(1):21-26.
16
Şengün H. Communication management in healthcare services. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. 2016;79(1):38-42.
17
Taşkıran HB, Engincan Y. The role of health communication campaigns and new media in the context of preventing health risks. Fourth Force International Refereed Journal. 2019;2(2):111-133.
18
Tabak RS. Health communication. 3rd ed. İstanbul: Literatür Publishing; 2006. p. 29.
19
Würz A, Nurm ÜK, Ekdahl K. Enhancing the role of health communication in the prevention of infectious diseases. J Health Commun. 2013;18(12):1566-1571.
20
Hülür AB. Health communication, media and ethics: analysis of a health news. Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences. 2016;14(1):155-178.
21
Lotfi S. Epilepsi hastalarının psikososyal sorunları ve sosyal hizmet uygulaması. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2023;27(3):509-518.
22
Buelow J, Miller W, Fishman J. Development of an epilepsy nursing communication tool: improving the quality of interactions between nurses and patients with seizures. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 2018;50(2):74-80.
23
Miller WR, Bakas T, Buelow JM. Problems, needs, and useful strategies in older adults self-managing epilepsy: implications for patient education and future intervention programs. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;31:25-30.
24
Kutlu İ, Demirel İ, Kazan G.Lives on alert: the problems and coping skills experienced by those who care for epileptic individuals. Journal of Academic Inquiries. 2021;16(1):189-211.
25
Bellon M, Pfeiffer W, Maurici V. Choice and control: how involved are people with epilepsy and their families in the management of their epilepsy? Results from an Australian survey in the disability sector. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;37:227-232.
26
Yeşildal M, Akman Dömbekci H, Öztürk YE. Health communication problems: a scale development study. Turkish Journal of Social Service Research. 2021;5(2):108-119.
27
Arslanoğlu A, Özargun G. The effect of health communication problems on the treatment process. Journal of Health and Social Welfare Research. 2023;5(2):212-223.
28
Bennett L, Bergin M, Gooney M, Doherty CP, Synnott C, Wells JS. Epilepsy services in Ireland: ‘a survey of people with epilepsy in relation to satisfaction, preferences and information provision’. Epilepsy Res. 2015;113:11-18.
29
Stern JM, Cendes F, Gilliam F, et al. Neurologist-patient communication about epilepsy in the United States, Spain, and Germany. Neurol Clin Pract. 2018;8(2):93-101.
30
Temel Ş. The relationship of health communication problems with patient empowerment and health information obtaining behavior from digital environments [doctoral thesis]. Konya: Selçuk University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Healthcare Management; 2024.
31
Arı A. The impact of health communication problems on trust in health systems: the case of Konya [master’s thesis]. Konya: Selcuk University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Healthcare Management; 2024.
32
Gül N, Akman Dömbekci H. The effect of health literacy on health communication problems: evaluation for Manisa province. Süleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal. 2023;14(38):649-665.
33
Ağalday Z. Examining the effect of health communication problems on healthcare system distrust [master’s thesis]. Mardin: Mardin Artuklu University, Department of Healthcare Management; 2023.
34
Mansur F. The effect of problems in health communication on violence against physicians. Journal of Business Academy. 2022;3(1):57-69.
35
Özmen S, Çelik F. Investigation of the relationship between health communication problems and expected and perceived service quality in a private dental clinic in Ankara. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Acharaka Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences Congress; 2022; p. 171-183.
36
Başol E. Patients with health professionals (doctors and nurses) communication between the problems and solutions. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Social Sciences Journal. 2018;4(1):76-93.
37
Chippa V, Roy K. Geriatric cognitive decline and polytherapy. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2024.
38
Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(1):57-65.
39
Trevisan C, Limongi F, Siviero P, et al. Mild polypharmacy and MCI progression in older adults: the mediation effect of drug-drug interactions. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(1):49-56.
40
Murt E, Daşlı Y. Health communication problems experienced by university students. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal. 2025;13(2):794.